Building a strong evidentiary base for the adoption of digital medicine tools to support clinical applications

Owned by David Proudlock (Unlicensed)
Last updated: May 16, 2021 by Becky Upton
1 min read

Interested? Who to contact:

@Becky Upton

@Ashley George (Unlicensed)

Problem

Currently, there is no terminology/ontology of digital trial types and associated quality metrics / aspects

Proposal:

To develop a toolkit defining a crosswalk between the proposed evidentiary frameworks already proposed by DiMe (in press) and the study design and reporting necessary to support a tool as fit for purpose in clinical applications.

Objectives / Proposed Deliverables

  1. Articulate a standard lexicon of digital study types

  2. Define quality metrics for categorising evidence used to designate a digital tools as fit-for-purpose in a clinical application (could limit to clinical trials to constrain scope)