Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Welcome to the Abvance II wiki home page.

This page was created on 30 April 2018.
This 'landing page' provides a top level view of the project and includes links to subsections and other relevant external content.
The AbVance II wiki is a 'live' document which will evolve in line with the project and is the 'go to' place for all the latest information.
Use the "edit" icon at the top of this page to edit and the "create" icon on the left to create a new page.
Contact richard.norman@pistoiaalliance.org if you have any questions about this wiki, including if you do not see the "edit" icon.

Proposal

The successful development of antibody molecules into approved drugs relies on optimizing a series of biophysical and pharmacological properties before the start of clinical trials. Failure during clinical trials or during the associated later stages of development is expensive. As such, early prediction of ‘developability’ risk is of key importance.

Our confidence in the ability to predict developability problems early by surrogate biophysical assays is limited by the low number of molecules with associated biophysical data and an agreed standard way of measuring this data across the industry. In addition, key pharmacological properties such as human and cyno PK (clearance), viscosity and solubility, and an understanding of whether these endpoint data could be predicted using biophysical surrogate data is lacking. Similar assays are used across the industry to predict developability risk (see Jain et al., 2017: http://www.pnas.org/content/114/5/944), but institutions use different methodologies.  Nevertheless, commonality can be expected among differently implemented assays of the same type.  For example we can expect some level of consistency in rank ordering of molecules by Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) even if different resins are used.

There is an opportunity to collectively identify the most predictive biophysical surrogate assays to understand variability among these, benchmark and establish best practices. In the first instance, this would act as an incentive for methods standardization and could subsequently encourage the building and growth of a common database to impact future antibody drug development.

About us

Based on the proposal we are working on our approach to achieving our draft objectives:

>Agree a standard/common way across industry of measuring data for 'well-known' biophysical assays.

>Share biophysical data generated by the above assays for sets of molecules contributed by industrial partners.

>Share associated endpoint data (e.g. human PK) for the above sets of molecules.

>Understand whether there is a line of sight (LoS) from biophysical data to endpoint data.

>Understand whether we can predict endpoint data from sequence/structure.


Join us and help shape and deliver the project: our Project Team Meetings are held every Tuesday, 17:00-18:00 (Central European Time)

If you are interested, contact the Project Manager: richard.norman@pistoiaalliance.org

Problem statement (and scale)

What level of agreement is there with the current problem statements?

“Our confidence in the ability to predict developability problems early by surrogate biophysical assays is limited by the low number of molecules with associated biophysical data and an agreed standard way of measuring this data across the industry.”

100% industry members polled AGREE0% industry members polled DISAGREE

“Key pharmacological properties such as human and cyno PK (clearance), viscosity and solubility, and an understanding of whether these endpoint data could be predicted using biophysical surrogate data is lacking.”

43% industry members polled AGREE57% industry members polled DISAGREE

What data/analysis is there to support/refute these statements?

How much data do we need to make difference and how are we going to test this?

The team

Name
Organisation
Location
Role
Relevant experience & interests
Qing Chai
Eli Lilly
San Diego, US


Craig Dickinson
Eli Lilly
San Diego, US


Francisco J. Fernández
Abvance Biotech
Madrid, ES


Bryan Jones
Eli Lilly
San Diego, US


Helen Li
Eli Lilly
San Diego, US


Chris Lloyd
MedImmune
Cambridge, UK


Carmen Nitsche
Pistoia Alliance

Business Development Lead

Richard Norman
Pistoia Alliance
Gjøvik, NO
Consultant Project Manager

Abhinandan Raghavan
Novartis
Basel, CH


Kieran Todd
GSK
Stevenage, UK


Scope


Strategy


Challenges


Questions


Blog stream

Blog stream

Create a blog post to share news and announcements with your team and company.

Recently updated

  • No labels